How to Use Real-Time Job Data in Your Next BRE Survey

Ask most EDOs what their single most recurring, most universal activity is, and business retention and expansion comes up before almost anything else. It's not a niche program a few regions run. It's foundational IEDC's 2025 State of the Field report found that 87% of practitioners surveyed identified business retention, expansion, and attraction as one of their priority strategies, and the logic behind that number is simple: most of a region's job growth doesn't come from landing the next big out-of-state relocation. It comes from the businesses already there.

Which is exactly why BRE surveys matter so much, and why they're also stuck using data that's already stale by the time anyone reads it.

The problem with the standard BRE survey

Walk through how most BRE programs actually run. A team schedules business visits, sends a survey, sits down with a local employer, and asks some version of: how's business, are you hiring, are you struggling to find workers, do you see yourself expanding or scaling back in the next year? Good questions. The problem isn't the questions. It's the timing.

A survey is a snapshot. It captures what a business tells you on the day you happen to ask, and then that answer sits in a spreadsheet for a year until the next visit cycle comes around. Meanwhile, the business itself has already moved on: hired the people they said they needed, stopped hiring for the roles they were worried about, or started posting for a role nobody mentioned in the interview because the need only showed up last month.

None of that is a flaw in BRE methodology. It's just the natural limit of survey-based data. You can't out-survey a labor market that changes weekly.

Where live job posting data changes the conversation

This is the part that live job data is actually good at. It shows you what a business is doing right now, because open job postings are a real-time signal of what a company needs.

Say a manufacturer in your region tells you business is steady during a visit. Nothing alarming, nothing exciting. But your dashboard shows they've posted 8 machinist roles in the last six weeks. That's worth asking about directly: is that expansion, is that turnover, or is that a skills gap they haven't mentioned yet. Each of those questions have a completely different follow-up. Expansion might mean a workforce training partnership or an incentive conversation. Turnover might mean a retention problem worth digging into before it becomes a bigger one. A skills gap might mean the community college program you've been trying to get funded just found its business case.

That's the shift. A live jobs feed turns "how's business" from an open-ended question into a specific, informed one. You walk into the visit already knowing something, instead of starting from zero.

What this looks like against the standard BRE checklist

IEDC's BRE training frames part of the program around learning the "red flags" that signal a company might be struggling or considering a move elsewhere. Live job data adds a second category worth watching just as closely: green flags. A sudden posting surge in a specific role type, a new job title that didn't exist at that company a year ago, postings appearing in a new location or shift pattern. Each of those is a lead worth following before your next scheduled visit, not a year after it.

Practically, here's where that shows up in a Rollie dashboard during BRE prep:

Before a business visit. Pull that company's posting history. Are they hiring more than last quarter, less, or about the same? Are the roles the same job titles as before, or has the mix shifted toward something new? That's a specific, current opening line for the visit instead of a generic check-in.

Across your whole target list. Sort by posting volume change over the last 60 or 90 days. The companies with the sharpest increases are candidates for an expansion conversation. The ones that have gone quiet after being steady posters are candidates for a retention check-in before a problem becomes a relocation.

By sector. If postings are climbing across an entire industry cluster in your region, that's a sector-level trend worth bringing to your board or your CEDS update, not just a single-company data point.

Why this matters for the survey itself, not just the visit

The conversation is only half of it. The other half is what you do with what you learn, and this is where fresh data does something a once-a-year survey structurally can't: it lets you validate what a business tells you against what they're actually doing. If a company says they're not hiring but their postings say otherwise, that's not necessarily a red flag on the business, it might just mean the survey caught them between conversations. But it's a prompt to ask a better follow-up question, and it's the kind of discrepancy that a purely survey-based BRE program has no way to catch at all.

It also gives you something concrete to bring back to city council, your board, or a funder when it's time to report on program impact: not just "we visited 40 businesses this year," but "we identified 12 businesses in active expansion based on hiring activity, and connected 5 of them to workforce training resources before they had to say so themselves." The same live data underpins how we think about grant workforce narratives too, since a lot of the same posting data that sharpens a BRE visit is exactly what a reviewer wants to see in a CEDS-aligned application.

Nothing beats human interaction

Job posting data isn't a replacement for the visit itself. A posting tells you a company has a need. It doesn't tell you why, what's driving it, or what kind of help would actually move the needle, that still takes a conversation, and BRE has always been a relationship-first practice for good reason. What live data does is make the relationship sharper. It turns a generic check-in into a specific, informed one, and it gives you a way to prioritize which businesses need a visit soonest instead of working strictly off a calendar.

If you want the fuller picture of how Rollie supports EDOs across BRE, grant writing, and site selection prep, that's covered on our Economic Development Organizations page.


If your EDO wants to see how live job posting data can sharpen your next BRE cycle book time with our team.

Chris Frederick

Associate Teaching Professor at the University of Notre Dame | Founder & CIO driving innovation.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/christoperfrederick/
Previous
Previous

How EDOs Can Talk About Workforce Data Without Sounding Like a Data Company

Next
Next

What to Put in a Grant Workforce Narrative (and Where to Find the Data in Five Minutes)